DETERMINING THE CURRENT AND FUTURE OPINIONS OF THE STUDENTS IN SECONDARY EDUCATION ON NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY *

Transkript

1

2 * DETERMINING THE CURRENT AND FUTURE OPINIONS OF THE STUDENTS IN SECONDARY EDUCATION ON NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY * KARATAY yunussevis1907@hotmail.com, fatihdogan@comu.edu.tr, ramazankaratay@gmail.com ÖZET i (n=273) ve anadolu Nanobiotekn Anahtar Kelimeler: Nanobioteknoloji, tutum ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to determine the current and future opinions of the students who pursue their secondary education on nanobiotechnology. A total of 584 high school students including those in the vocational high school (n=226), in the anatolian high school (n=273) and in the anatolian teacher high school (n=85) participated in the study. The data of the study, which was conducted by means of screening method, were obtained by means of 5-likert type Scale of Nanobiotechnology Attitude and 3-likert type Nanobiotechnology Knowledge Test. The data indicated that the levels of the attitudes of the students towards nanobiotechnology were moderate and their knowledge on the issue was in a low level. In the analysis on the attitudes of the students in terms of demographic characteristics, it was determined that their attitudes varied significantly by the department that the students study but not by their grades, gender and graduated high school. Furthermore, it was revealed that the levels of knowledge of the students varied significantly by the type of school but not by their genders, grade or department. Keywords: Nanobiotechnology, attitudes guidance of Asst This study is a part of under the

3 VII. Uluslar teknolojilerin neler old teknolojisinden bilgisayar ). ölçeklerde makinele bir araya getirerek -9 ), yani milimetrenin milyo bi

4 Nanoteknoloji tüm -biyoteknoloji - (Nanoteknoloji Strateji Grubu, 2004). Yine T e kantitatif - Strateji Grubu, 2004). iyi

5 VII. Uluslar Deniz (20 knolojiye yönelik olumlu hem enen Vizyon 2023 Teknoloji

6 göstermekte midir? YÖNTEM Evren ve Örneklem demogr N f (%) Cinsiyet ,1 Erkek ,9 Okul Türü Meslek Lisesi ,7 Anadolu Lisesi , , , , , ,0 Bölüm , ,1 Sözel 48 8,2 Dil 11 1,9 Toplam ,0

7 VII. Uluslar TÖ ve NBT birlikte Verilerin Analizi r. Toplanan veriler Orta Dü

8 Uygulanan anket verilerini yorumlamak için ö 96) Orta 0.67 BULGULAR = 3,19). Yine ( =,30). Ölçek N Ss NTÖ 584 3,19,77 NBT 584,30,30 Ölçek Cinsiyet N Ss sd t p NTÖ 211 3,16,76 Erkek 373 3,20,77 582,646,517 NBT 211,30,31 Erkek 373,31,30 582,267,791 -

9 VII. Uluslar - Aradaki bu fark incele (582)=,646, p>.05]. = 3,20> = 3,16). (582)=,267, p>.05]. =,31> e Ölçek Okul Türü N Ss NTÖ NBT Meslek Lisesi 226 3,15,75 Anadolu Lisesi 273 3,16, ,37,74 Meslek Lisesi 226,29,30 Anadolu Lisesi 273,29,29 85,38,36 Lisesi ( ve Anadolu Lisesi ise en d =,29; =,29). =,38), Meslek Lisesi Ölçek sd Kareler F p NTÖ NBT 3, , , ,583 Toplam 342, ,618 2,309 53, ,092 Toplam 54, ,889, ,357,036* ML-AÖL AL-AÖL Tablo 5 e göre, NTÖ den görülmektedir [F (2, 581) = 2,889, p>.05]. (2, 581)= bulmak için TUKEY testi

10 Nanobiyot = 3,07); NBT de en yüksek puan = Ölçek N Ss NTÖ NBT ,23, ,07, ,33, ,26, ,30, ,28, ,37, ,33,37 Tablo 7 ye göre, NTÖ ve NBT den ktedir [F (3,580) = 2,549, p>.05 ; F (3,580) = 1,401, p>.05]. Ölçek Kareler sd Kareler F p NTÖ NBT 4, , , ,583 Toplam 342, ,389 3,130 53, ,93 Toplam 54, ,549, ,401, Tablo 8 = 3,95), en =,30 ; ün Ölçek Bölüm N Ss NTÖ 355 3,15,75

11 VII. Uluslar 170 3,24,68 Sözel 48 3,10,96 Dil 11 3,95 1,26 NBT 355,30,30 170,30,30 Sözel 48,32,34 Dil 11,44,46 (3,580)= 4,398, p>.05]. (3,580)=,803, Tablo 9.NTÖ ve NBT Ölçek Kareler sd Kareler NTÖ 7, , , ,577 Toplam 342, NBT,224 3,075 53, ,93 Toplam 54, F p 4,398,005* Fark,803, Tablo 10. R 2 Stnd. Beta t p NBT NTÖ,172,415 1,043 10,993,000* da, bilgi düzeyleri ile 2 =0.172), bilgi düzeyinin 583)= , p<0.05). Bilgi düzeyi, nanobiyoteknol SAY- EA- SÖZ- (1- Regresyon analizi sonucuna göre, nanobiyoteknolojiye yönelik tutumu yordayan regresyon Nanobiyoteknolojiye Yönelik Tutum = (1.043 x Nanobiyoteknoloji Bilgi Düzeyi)

12 lik tutum ve bilgi düzeylerinin NTÖ de Nanobiyoteknoloji ile s

13 VII. Uluslar Kaynaklar Correard, I. Twelve years of technologye Education in France, England and the Netherlands: how do pupils perceive the subject?. PATT-11 Conference Proceedings, Dur -55. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 23, 62-71, Emel, E,, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Fen Bilimleri Fang, R., Teng, C., Chen, C. How Taiwanese and Americans think about technology. Journal of Technology Education, 18, (2): 7-23, Jones, R. (2006). What can Biology Teach Us? Nature Nanotechnology, 1( 2), Khunyakari, R., Mehrotra, S., Natarajan, C., Chunawala, S. Studying Indian middle school student attitudes towards technology. episteme-3 International Conference to Review Research in Science, Technology and Mathematics Education, Mumbai, 81-88, Leslie G. and Schibeci, R. (2003). What Do Science Teachers Think Biotechnology is? Does it Matter? Australian ScienceTeachers Journal. 49(3), Biotechnologyand Genetic Engineer ing. Technology in Society. 23, Nanoteknoloji Strateji Grubu. (2004). Vizyon 2023 Projesi Nanobilim Stratejileri.Ankara. ve Nanoteknoloji Osborne, J., Simon, S., Collins, S. Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25, (9): , Özgen, Ramsden, J. M.. Mission impossible? Can anything be done about attitudes to science?. International Journal of Science Education, 20, (2): , Tegart G. (2003). Perspectives of Emerging Technologies. The Second International Conference on Technology Foresight February Tokyo. Tekin, H. (2008). Volk, K., Yip, M. W., Lo, T. K. and technology programs. Journal of Technology Education, 15, (1): 48-63, 2003.